Daily Fishing and Outdoor Report
How to tell a dieting giraffe ... (That's backdrop artwork it's hypothetically dining upon)
Below: I can't believe somebody beat me to this Mentos and diet soda experiment. You snooze, you lose.
Below: That little kid knew he was in deep trouble even before contact ...
Monday, April 03, 2017: I’m taking a deep breath before action picks up on the fishing and outdoorsing fronts. Not that I haven’t been out and about aplenty. But, much of my outdoorsing has been on the QT, as I explore while drawing minimal attention to myself. No, it’s nothing illegal. I just prefer to explore alone – add a George Thorogood & The Destroyers riff if you must, maybe “You know when I hike alone, I prefer to be by myself.”
This is the time of year I enjoy making runs over to the Mullica, mid-way river points, like the landings and bridges. Small bass is the most I’ve heard of off the bridges lately. The landings have been very quiet.
Graveling has seen small fish at very most. See Scott's report below.
I haven’t talked about it all that much of late but the LBI ocean is gorgeous – clean and inviting, be it for surfing or surfcasting. I took a 44.8 water temp but have heard surface waters near 50, i.e. schoolie bass temps.
There are small bass in the bay, north to south. Nighttime. Artificials.
Below: The next time you want to run out to watch a demolition ... be advised
REPLEN CLARIFICATION: I need to dispel a minor misunderstanding floating around regarding beach replenishment on LBI. There will be NO Army Corps-based beach replenishment done until after summer, i.e. falltime. That’s when HC, SC and BB areas will get pumped upon ... again.
That clarified, I see no way that Holgate won’t get shoreline sand prior to summer IF (!?) the Little Egg Inlet channel dredge effort passes muster. However, the jury (Army Corps) remains mum on the workability of such a program, though a decision has to come mighty dang soon.
As to where, in Holgate, sucked up channel sand would go -- or how much of it will be pumped -- is a troubling mystery. "Why so?," you ask. Just try to tell me how much sand must be removed to build a proper and navigable channel in a big-ass inlet that has never had a man-made channel built through it before? Make sure to factor in the depth and width? Hey, don't ask me how deep or wide one makes a state-official channel. Remember, this isn't a fed channel.
In other words, I defy anyone to know specific sand volumes prior to starting the effort. Surely, guesses must be made -- but that's just what they'll be. Translating that mysterious amount of sand into actual beach coverage distances and depths ...?? Forget about it.
With that, I'll now add a very real possibility: Feds say "no way" to beach placement of sand ... but don't give a rat's rear about a channel build. So, the channel-building sand gets pumped out past the shoals; dumped at sea, as it were. That would sidestep ACE, avoid any interference with summer beachgoing types, while sidestepping any "adjacency clause" protests from the now be-plovered Forsythe Refuge.
Most recent report from ...
Scott's Daily Fishing Report
|Friday, March 31, 2017 /\/\/\ 10:00am|
Another day goes by with still no keeper stripers weighed in from anglers fishing at Graveling Point. As always, there are fish stories. Wednesday evening, Joe knows he had a keeper size bass that he lost attempting to drag it up on the bank. He thinks the power pro cut on a mussel shell. This morning, it is raining steady and forecast to continue raining all day. I don't expect to see much fishing activity which means that no Graveling Point keeper stripers will be weighed in the month of March. The latest first keeper was caught by Dave Curry on April 19, 2014. Are you curious to see when the first keeper was weighed in each year for the past twenty plus years? Check out the Spring Run list. http://www.scottsbt.com/fishing/stripers/springrun.htm
Sea Ya -SBT Crew
Name: Joseph Yurko
Date of Trip: 05/30/17
Location of Trip: Graveling point
Species Sought: Striper
Time of Day Fished: Late Afternoon
Tide Fished: Low Tide (Outgoing water)
Weather Conditions: Partly Sunny/Partly Cloudy
Wind Conditions: less than 10 kts. NW
Sea Conditions: less than 2 ft.
Primary Bait: Bloodworms
Secondary Bait: No Second Bait Used
Lure Used: No Lures Used (Rig or Hook Only)
Fished for two hours in my boat 1/4 mile just off the point. Caught six throwback Stripers 15/16 in., all very healthy looking and strong. About 10 others fishing from the bank with more coming in when I left at 6 pm. Joe
Please read the following, by the the National Coalition for Fishing Communities, with the aim: "Gives voice to the numerous communities that make up America’s domestically harvested and processed seafood industry."
As to their finding, I range from mildly disagreeing to calling it utter bullshit, bomb-dropped by industry-favoring researchers.
"But, Jay, these are scientists," you say.
I'll never stop repeating my absolutely accurate account of an organized save-the-surf effort (Surfrider roots) I joined while studying in San Diego. The surf-saving group used donations to hire a top scientist to study the ecological impact of a proposed breakwater, which would kill a semi-decent surf spot. The scientist soon returned with an impressively detailed shop-talk appraisal of the impacts. Even though I was studying such stuff at the time, the marine environment data he rattled off was mind-numbingly complex. After the presentation, a small voice from the back of a large crowd reflected everyone's confusion, asking, "What does all this mean?" He got an answer that was, firstly, stunning to me ... and damn-near life altering thereafter. The scientist said, "What do you want it to mean?" He was totally serious.
Hopefully, you see why I bring it up now, in a science-for-hire sense.
I'm not even remotely rebuking all science, which will always be my favorite subject. However, the ability to manipulate data, while remaining anchored in science, is now an immense and immediate paradox -- and danger -- in modern times.
Below: Anything more than the proverbial hand slap is unlikely:
SEAFOODNEWS.COM [Miami Herald] by Jenny Staletovich - April 3, 2017
Florida wildlife officers made a grisly discovery aboard a Key West shrimp boat this week: dozens of pairs of dismembered shark fins.
The boat was discovered about 20 miles north of the island Wednesday night, an indication that illegal finning still occurs in Florida waters despite being banned more than 16 years ago. Buying and selling fins also remains legal in most states, fueling a practice that targets some of the world’s biggest and longest-lived sharks that are also among the planet’s oldest species.
“When we import them we have no idea if they came from sustainable shark fisheries or fisheries where they’re still finning,” said Mariah Pfleger, a scientist for Oceana, which is pushing a bill to ban the trade.
The boat was stopped by Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission officers who alerted the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Service. FWC referred questions to NOAA and NOAA declined to release details, saying it was too soon in the investigation.
However, Oceana reported that officers found between 30 and 40 pairs of fins. NOAA Fisheries is continuing to investigate and no charges have been filed, spokeswoman Kim Amendola said in an email.
Worldwide, shark finning has been blamed for killing up to 73 million sharks every year, with 27,000 tons of fins traded in 2013. The practice can be particularly gruesome: after their fins are sliced off, the sharks are often tossed overboard and either suffocate because they can’t swim or are eaten by other predators.
And the problems caused by overfishing and finning aren’t limited to just sharks. In their absence, smaller fish they eat are increasing, which is decimating populations of shellfish. Over fishing has also become so severe that many species are being killed at a rate faster than they can reproduce, further driving down numbers.
The loss of sharks could also have economic repercussions: shark tourism helps pump more than $220 million annually into Florida’s economy and produces about 3,700 jobs, Oceana reported earlier this month.
A bill to ban the trade, introduced last year with bipartisan backing, is now winding its way through Congress.
SEAFOODNEWS.COM [ADN] by Laine Welch - April 3, 2017
Seafood sales at American retail stores are on an upswing and should remain that way for the foreseeable future. Better yet for commercial fishermen, demand for fish caught wild in the U.S. showed the biggest gains of all.
That's good news for Alaska, which provides nearly 65 percent of wild-caught seafood to our nation's supermarkets (95 percent of wild-caught salmon).
A new survey by trade magazine Progressive Grocer showed that retail seafood sales rose nearly 40 percent over the past year, and 56 percent predicted an upturn in seafood sales this year.
U.S. wild-caught seafood topped the list for the highest demand increase by nearly 58 percent of retail respondents, especially products from Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico.
A breakdown of this year's Retail Seafood Review by Seafood Source showed that wild-caught seafood was perceived as being of higher quality, and 53 percent said wild tastes better than farm-raised fish.
The review said Americans are buying less beef, chicken and pork due to health concerns and issues linked to animal welfare and environmental impacts.
Analysts at FoodDive said, "This gives retailers an excellent opportunity to grow the seafood category, but much work is needed in terms of advertising and consumer education to get customers to bite."
To lure more seafood shoppers, experts advised sellers to increase in-store signage and make smarter use of digital coupons and promotions.
The Retail Seafood Review said that temporary price reductions were the most popular and effective form of promotion. Asked what they would like from seafood suppliers to improve sales, respondents suggested "lower pricing on less popular fish to get people to try it."
Here's a fun take on fast-food fish sandwiches with some biting feedback. Writers at BusinessInsider sampled seven sandwiches, with Arby's Crispy Fish ranking last "with no taste or joy."
Dairy Queen's Alaska cod sandwich is described as "a fillet slicked by a spill of tartar sauce that would offend even the Exxon Valdez disaster."
Burger King's fish sandwich is "gray and sad." McDonald's is "boring."
White Castle's fish slider is crispy but "bland and sorry looking." Popeye's Seafood Po'boy has "more breading than fish."
The winner? Wendy's premium cod fillet, which the Insiders said reminded them of an "honest-to-goodness fish fry."
Salmon at center stage
Many Alaskans will tell you they want to protect our wild stocks of salmon, but how to do that brings different perspectives. A Salmon Policy Forum in Juneau will advance the discussion, with a focus on the Alaska laws that protect salmon habitat.
"This forum is not intended to push any agenda. It is educational and informational and a way to get ideas on the table and have a more in-depth conversation," said Lindsey Bloom, manager of the Salmon Habitat Information Project for United Fishermen of Alaska, a forum co-sponsor.
Panel discussions will include historians, scientists, managers, miners and, hopefully, legislators. The forum is 5:30-8:30 p.m. April 11 at the Rockwell Ballroom. It is co-sponsored by the Center for Salmon and Society at the College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and Salmon Connect.
Fishermen can get cash back for their crew license fees — if they purchase them online.
It's the first year the Alaska Department of Fish and Game is providing the online opportunity to replace paper licenses being purchased from vendors. It's more convenient for customers, and switching from paper to e-licenses saves the state cash.
"If we were able to achieve 100 percent online sales for licenses, it would save the department a couple hundred thousand dollars. Even at 50 percent sales, it's a big savings for us," said Forrest Bowers, deputy director of the commercial fisheries division in Juneau.
Crew licenses are the latest addition to ADF&G's online store, which offers print-at-home options for nearly every Alaska fishing and hunting license.
Signup for our daily newsletter
The department hopes to lure fishermen to the online store with 10 free crew license giveaways.
"If you're randomly selected, the cost of the license will be refunded to you," Bowers said, adding that the deadline is Oct. 6.
Annual commercial crew licenses cost $60 for Alaska residents and $277 for non-residents. Seven-day licenses cost $30 for both residents and non-residents.
Had an awesome day in the Indian ocean today. Dropped Leanne's new craypot with her brand new pink floats looked really nice in the Bluewater. Hopefully it'll be full when we pull it!!! We caught a few awesome fish and released a few and we caught 2 stingrays. Look forward to when we pull her pot!!!!!
Comments are closed for this blog post